https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > The same text existed in F2018, so it is not new: F2018:C7103 and Note 1.
> >
> > Either every compiler developer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The same text existed in F2018, so it is not new: F2018:C7103 and Note 1.
>
> Either every compiler developer team misunderstood that clause, or we
> need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The same text existed in F2018, so it is not new: F2018:C7103 and Note 1.
>
> Either every compiler developer team misunderstood that clause, or we
> need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The same text existed in F2018, so it is not new: F2018:C7103 and Note 1.
Either every compiler developer team misunderstood that clause, or we
need an interp, based on the example, to be able
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Can you be a little more explicit?
>
> If I extend the program as follows:
>
> type(params) :: p
> p = params( 0.1, 2.0 )
> write(*,*) p
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you be a little more explicit?
If I extend the program as follows:
type(params) :: p
p = params( 0.1, 2.0 )
write(*,*) p
p = params( 0.1, 2 )
write(*,*) p
I get with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114438
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
