--- Comment #21 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-21
11:58 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Thanks! The incorrect warnings have gone away.
However, if I provoke correct warnings now, the line numbers in the warning
messages are really confused,
--- Comment #22 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-21 13:31 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
martin,
Should I open a new PR for this?
I have a half memory that there is already a PR for this. Could you
check first before submitting a new one,
--- Comment #23 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-21
16:59 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I have a half memory that there is already a PR for this. Could you
check first before submitting a new one, please?
If you are referring to PR21918, I think the current
--- Comment #24 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-21 20:13 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
martin,
--- Comment #23 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-21
16:59 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I have a half memory that there is
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 18111
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:10 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 18111
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #17 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-18 05:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR18111
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00634.html
--
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 12:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12083)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12083action=view)
Fix for the PR
Jakub,
The last part of this patch is required to stop the likes of the function f1,
in
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 13:04 ---
It looks good to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
--- Comment #16 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-16 21:58 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 13:04 ---
It looks good to me.
Thanks, Jakub; I was
--- Comment #12 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-06-06
10:10 ---
This is now open since more than a year.
Is there any hope of getting it fixed for gfortran 4.2?
Correct uninitialized warnings are a very desirable feature IMO
and have always been a stron point in gcc.
--- Comment #13 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-06-06
10:11 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Correct uninitialized warnings are a very desirable feature IMO
Sorry, I meant unused of course :(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
--- Comment #11 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-11-20
12:10 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I reran the test with the current gfortran. This is what I get:
~/tmpgfortran -Wunused -W -v -c -O2 bla.f90
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-01-09
04:46 ---
This breaks -Werror builds.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-11-05
08:31 ---
Since the patch has been approved
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02547.html),
could someone please commit it?
Or is it better to wait for the complete fix?
--
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot
de 2004-11-05 11:20 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-11-05
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 19:52
---
Subject: Bug 18111
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 19:52:06
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-decl.c
Log
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 20:03 ---
The commit fixes the original issue, but not all of those mentioned in comment
#4. The remaining issues are related to arrays with descriptors.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-10-26
11:15 ---
The patch indeed supresses the warnings about .__result.
But the problem appears to be more general. The following code
still generates a warning:
module linebufmod
implicit none
private
public
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2004-10-26
11:23 ---
Here is a more comprehensive example:
module foo
implicit none
contains
subroutine bar(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)
character(len=80), intent(in) :: arg1
character(len=80), dimension(:), intent(in)
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-26 17:32 ---
Updated patch which removes the warning for the string length parameters here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02210.html
I'm not yet sure why the other warnings happen.
--
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:41 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-10/msg00183.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-22 14:09
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
25 matches
Mail list logo
