--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 15:28
---
*** Bug 30979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 16:10 ---
Should I backport this to 4.1? I guess it makes sense since this can be
considered a regressions WRT g77.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 16:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=13120)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13120action=view)
gcc41-pr25392.patch
Yes, I think so. Attached is what we have in Red Hat gcc 4.1.x tree for a few
days already
--- Comment #15 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug 25392
Author: tobi
Date: Tue Feb 27 19:20:21 2007
New Revision: 122382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122382
Log:
2006-12-29 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/25392
*
--- Comment #16 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 19:21 ---
The patch has moved into its new home on the 4.1 branch.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 18:54 ---
Subject: Bug 25392
Author: tobi
Date: Fri Dec 29 18:54:41 2006
New Revision: 120274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120274
Log:
Backport from trunk:
fortran/
PR fortran/25392
* trans-stmt.c
--- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 18:56 ---
Fixed in 4.2 and trunk.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:05 ---
Subject: Bug 25392
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Dec 21 03:04:43 2006
New Revision: 120099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120099
Log:
PR fortran/25392
fortran/
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_return): Fix
--- Comment #9 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:17 ---
Keeping this open, until the fix is also in 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 01:18 ---
I have a patch, but it adds another ugly layer of code, I'll try to clean this
mess up and then submit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-04 12:18 ---
Of course it is - see my analysis in PR26440 - but it is a mess.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-30 08:54
---
Reduced testcase:
real function foo ()
if (foo .gt. 0) call abort
end
I'm almost sure it's a type mismatch problem. The above code generates the
following tree dump:
foo ()
{
real8 __result_foo;
if
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 11:36
---
File entry-4.f90 from the gfortran testsuite also ICEs with -ff2c:
$ gfortran -c entry_4.f90 -ff2c
src/entry_4.f90: In function f2:
src/entry_4.f90:12: internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 17:40 ---
*** Bug 26440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 03:42 ---
D.784 = __result_foo 1.8e+2f;
D.786 = __result_foo - 3.6e+2f;
D.788 = __result_foo = -1.8e+2f;
D.790 = __result_foo + 3.6e+2f;
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 06:48 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
