--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27709
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 28 19:46:22 2006
New Revision: 114173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114173
Log:
2006-05-28 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:51 ---
Subject: Bug 27709
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 28 19:50:51 2006
New Revision: 114174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114174
Log:
2006-05-28 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 19:57 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from David at ham dot dropbear dot id dot au 2006-05-27
17:10 ---
I can confrim that the patched source tree compiles both the test case provided
and the original code.
Thank you very much, Paul, for sorting this out so quickly!
--
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 05:09 ---
Subject: Bug 27709
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 26 05:09:18 2006
New Revision: 114127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114127
Log:
2006-05-26 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 13:37 ---
I agree - see the list.
In fact, I have just been hit by the same problem and have to fix it. I'll be
as quick as I can!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 18:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=11507)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11507action=view)
The fix for this PR
The enclosed patch fixes the problem. It has been regtested on FC5/Athlon and
fixes the
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-25 05:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27709
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01288.html
--
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 17:24 ---
Is this standard conforming?
I just re-read the section on specification expressions for the unmpteenth time
and have not clarified it in my mind!
If you cannot point to the bit of the standard that allows it, I
--- Comment #2 from David at ham dot dropbear dot id dot au 2006-05-23
18:18 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Is this standard conforming?
I've got the May 2004 draft Fortran 2003 standard from the WG5 archive.
Hopefully it says the same thing as F95 and final F2003.
I presume that
10 matches
Mail list logo
