[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 08:11 --- I believe that all of the nonstandard intrinsics have now been documented in 4.2 and 4.3, and thus I am closing this bug as fixed. -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 08:47 --- This bug was erroneously closed. The following intrinsics are undocumented in 4.2: INT2, SHORT INT8, LONG MCLOCK MCLOCK8 SECOND The relevant bits of intrinsic.c: add_sym_1 (int2, ELEMENTAL, ACTUAL_NO,

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |brooks at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 09:00 --- Relevant pieces of trans-intrinsic.c: /* Integer conversions are handled separately to make sure we get the correct rounding mode. */ case GFC_ISYM_INT: case GFC_ISYM_INT2: case

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 09:15 --- Relevant parts of libgfortran/clock.c: GFC_INTEGER_4 mclock (void) { #ifdef HAVE_CLOCK return (GFC_INTEGER_4) clock (); #else return (GFC_INTEGER_4) -1; #endif } GFC_INTEGER_8 mclock8 (void) { #ifdef HAVE_CLOCK

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 02:43 --- Subject: Bug 28068 Author: brooks Date: Wed Mar 14 02:43:27 2007 New Revision: 122902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122902 Log: PR fortran/28068 * intrinsic.texi: General whitespace cleanup,

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 02:45 --- Subject: Bug 28068 Author: brooks Date: Wed Mar 14 02:45:14 2007 New Revision: 122903 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122903 Log: PR fortran/28068 * intrinsic.texi: General whitespace cleanup,

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2007-03-13 Thread brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-14 02:46 --- _Now_ this is fixed on 4.2 and trunk. :) -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2006-07-28 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 08:53 --- (In reply to comment #0) It would also be nice to have a compiler parameter to turn off non-standard intrinsics. By the way: the correct option to compile standard code is to use -std=f95. That will turn off

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2006-06-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 23:47 --- perror is an old g77 intrinsics. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28068

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2006-06-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 23:51 --- Confirmed. perror was added by: 2005-03-22 Francois-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * check.c (gfc_check_chdir, gfc_check_chdir_sub, gfc_check_kill, gfc_check_kill_sub, gfc_check_link,

[Bug fortran/28068] Non-standard intrinsics should be documented

2006-06-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 02:06 --- See the first two sentences in Section 8 of gfortran.info. This is very low hanging fruit, and is placed way below fixing actual bugs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28068