--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28914
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 05:07
---
Fixed on 4.2 only, Follow PR20923 for long compile time issues.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 04:58
---
Subject: Bug 28914
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 10 04:58:29 2006
New Revision: 116809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116809
Log:
2006-09-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 28914
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 10 04:53:18 2006
New Revision: 116808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116808
Log:
2006-09-09 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 04:18
---
Apatch for this bug has been submitted to the fortran list for approval.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The proposed change in comment #8 appears to give several testsuite failures.
>
Yes, I know; see the email that I sent you today. The original patch on #5
works fine and is nearly the righ
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 19:33
---
The proposed change in comment #8 appears to give several testsuite failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28914
--- Comment #8 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-09-04
12:08 ---
Even simpler is:
trans-array.c(gfc_trans_array_constructor_value)
replace loopvar = se.expr;
byloopvar = gfc_evaluate_now (se.expr, pblock);
gfc_expand_constructor is called f
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 03:44
---
Just an added note. Compile time for large values of n is very long. Many
seconds. For n - 2000
$ time gfc pr28914.f90
real1m5.009s
user1m3.896s
sys 0m0.048s
This is on 3.2 gigahertz machine.
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-02 19:24
---
I tested the provisional patch on i686-linux-pc-gnu.
Had to set tmp_loopvar = NULL when declared to avoid warning message on
possibly uninitialized variable.
Fixes the test case in this PR. Regression testsd
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-09-01
13:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=12168)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12168&action=view)
A provisional fix for the problem
This is not regtested.
Also, I know that there is a better way t
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-09-01
13:45 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Setting the parameter n=65535, the program appears to execute correctly.
> However, the pr28914.f90.003t.original file is 706800 bytes long and embedded
> with a very large sta
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 05:28
---
Setting the parameter n=65535, the program appears to execute correctly.
However, the pr28914.f90.003t.original file is 706800 bytes long and embedded
with a very large static declaration of the array. As if it
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 02:47 ---
Well, you do need to upgrade your compiler, but there appears to be
a bug :(
If n <= 65000, the program works fine. For larger n, the combination
of
do i = 1, 1
a = (/ (i, i = 1, n) /)
end do
i
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 02:06 ---
Upgrade gfortran to at least 4.1.1. The code works
fine with gfortran 4.2.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
