--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 00:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=12299)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12299action=view) [edit]
Legacy code example
Compiles fine with every other compiler out there.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 04:30 ---
I failed to not that your assertion that the error message
is misleading is incorrect. The error message is actually
quite concise and accurate. See section 5.2.10 of the F95
standard.
I submitted a patch that will
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 04:55 ---
Fixed on trunk. Although the patch would work
on 4.1, it isn't needed because I never fixed range
checking on 4.1.
Use -fno-range-check option.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
