--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 16:57
---
Subject: Bug 29711
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Nov 25 16:57:25 2006
New Revision: 119203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119203
Log:
PR fortran/29711
* error.c (error_print):
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-19 18:19 ---
I though I had replyed to my last comment, but seemingly I forget to Commit
the comment.
I tested with de and zh_TW (Zhonghua/Taiwan alias Guoyu) locale and the result
is ok. [Well, in Chinese it least it looks as if
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 16:44
---
Created an attachment (id=12618)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12618action=view)
Patch mentionned in previous comment
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29711
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 10:39
---
I'll take that one.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 16:44
---
What about:
de.f90:4:
use foo, only : bar
1
Fehler: Bei (1) referenziertes Symbol »bar« nicht im Modul »foo« gefunden
My limited german knowledge seems to indicate that it's OK, but I'm not sure.
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 17:16 ---
Fehler: Bei (1) referenziertes Symbol »bar« nicht im Modul »foo« gefunden
My limited german knowledge seems to indicate that it's OK, but I'm not sure.
Looks ok.
Could you try the attached patch on a few cases
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-04 17:22 ---
This is just a case of error_print not understanding that syntax unlike the
rest of GCC which does. The translators should be told it does not support it
but we don't control them. This is an enhancement for
