--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-17 17:17 ---
Subject: Bug 30554
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 17 17:16:56 2007
New Revision: 122074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122074
Log:
2007-02-17 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 23:40 ---
Subject: Bug 30554
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 12 23:39:51 2007
New Revision: 121865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121865
Log:
2007-02-13 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:59 ---
Subject: Bug 30554
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 11 20:58:48 2007
New Revision: 121824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121824
Log:
2007-02-11 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-09 12:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30554
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00807.html
--
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 12:05 ---
PS
I need to examine the part of the standard that deals with PRIVATE and PUBLIC
in modules to see if this really is right.
I should have said, even if it is not correct, this clearly is touching the
right
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 21:11 ---
This fixes the problem and regtests OK:
Index: gcc/fortran/module.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/module.c(revision 121540)
--- gcc/fortran/module.c
--- Comment #7 from jellby at yahoo dot com 2007-02-02 09:26 ---
The patch seems to fix the problem with the test file. Unfortunately, the
original problem with the Dynamo package remains, I still get:
gfortran -c -I./modules -J./modules -O3 -o objects/energy.o ./source/energy.F90
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 10:03 ---
The patch seems to fix the problem with the test file. Unfortunately, the
original problem with the Dynamo package remains:
Modified test case - added:
PRIVATE
PUBLIC :: ENergY_CONTRAINT
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 07:26 ---
Aaahhh... that's disappointing. I'm off on a trip agian next week and this
will be loaded up on the portable as the 5 here and 5 there task.
Paul
PS
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30554
