--- Comment #6 from mralanmorgan at gmail dot com 2007-09-09 11:12 ---
oooh someone's got their panties in a bunch. Sorry that you are so
disillusioned by your own importance or whatever.
My intial point stands... no real point in raising simple bugs if it takes
years to fix. I
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-03 11:47 ---
Re. comment #3:
Wow. Thanks for your encouraging comment. Now people know not to waste time on
your bugs, because you're just another rude complaining troll.
Oh, wait... Maybe not.
Fortunately, most people
--- Comment #3 from mralanmorgan at gmail dot com 2007-06-02 09:51 ---
Wow. Nothing is happening.
Glad I bothered raising the bug.
Now I know not to waste time documenting the other ten or so bugs I've found.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31310
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-02 12:45 ---
Wow. Nothing is happening.
You are right that unfortunately not much happened regarding this feature
request during the last two and a half months, however, in total quite a lot
happened:
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 21:34
---
We probably don't want to add all the g77 case options, but I can see why
-fcase-preserve would be a good one to add.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-22 13:05 ---
Or a workaround / new method for mixed case functions calls from gfortran
to C.
In the Fortran-Experiments branch exists support for C bindings:
subroutine fortranname bind(C,name='C_Name')
(Planned to be
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31310
