[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 09:36 --- I have just posted a patch, so I had better take the PR on! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00027.html Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 11:17 --- Subject: Bug 32315 Author: pault Date: Tue Feb 5 11:16:33 2008 New Revision: 132113 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132113 Log: 2008-02-05 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:06 --- Fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 10:48 --- This is a regression vs. g77: $ cat foo.f program chkdata character*20 string(4) data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / write(*,*) string end $ g77 foo.f foo.f: In