--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 06:03 ---
Subject: Bug 32600
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jul 23 06:03:33 2007
New Revision: 126835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126835
Log:
2007-07-23 Christopher D. Rickett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-22 06:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 32600
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01540.html
--
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-21 08:04 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-21 08:04 ---
Wait only C_LOC was fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-21 20:17 ---
Besides c_funloc (patch submitted) and c_f_pointer (scalar case, i.e. no SHAPE)
also c_associated (c_associated_1/c_associated_2) can be moved into trans*.c
The code for c_associated is essentially the same as for
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 06:14 ---
Subject: Bug 32600
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jul 19 06:14:19 2007
New Revision: 126744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126744
Log:
2007-07-19 Christopher D. Rickett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-18 23:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 32600
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01565.html
--
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 23:09 ---
Analogously for c_f_pointer (without SHAPE) and c_f_funpointer:
use iso_c_binding
implicit none
integer, target :: tgt
type(c_ptr) :: cptr
integer, pointer :: ptr
cptr = c_loc(tgt)
call c_f_pointer(cptr,ptr)
end
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 03:55 ---
This just an optimization request, right? The functions calls work?
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 05:27 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This just an optimization request, right? The functions calls work?
Yes - at least all my test programs work.
Though there might be some combinations of c_f_pointer which don't work; at
11 matches
Mail list logo
