[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 12:48 --- Subject: Bug 33233 Author: pault Date: Thu Oct 18 12:48:37 2007 New Revision: 129437 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129437 Log: 2007-10-18 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 13:54 --- Fixed on trunk. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-14 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-15 01:06 --- Subject: Bug number PR33233 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00745.html --

[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 14:55 --- (In reply to comment #1) Ah this bug was present before my patch for PR30746. I can see from my notes that I was fixated on PR30746, whilst not altering the behaviour of gfortran in any other way., whether

[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-11 17:30 --- Works as expected: now gfortran agrees with xlf. Regtest almost finished in 32 bit mode. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33233

[Bug fortran/33233] Parent and contained procedure: Wrongly treated as generic procedures

2007-10-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 04:13 --- Tobias, I am not sure how this got so screwed up. As you say, the Cohen testcase is correct and I must, surely(?), have been checking that *sigh* Confirmed Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: