--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 20:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33745
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Oct 14 20:24:20 2007
New Revision: 129302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129302
Log:
2007-10-14 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 20:29 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-15 01:07 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33745
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00796.html
--
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 14:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The wrong-code bug is fixed by the followed patch.
Actually, it is not. The problem is - both in the compile time and at the run
time bound checking - the combination of element vs. array
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 20:53 ---
Mine.
Patch for both problems, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00796.html
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 06:36 ---
Forgot to mention that this bug was reported by Tom in
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/8fac8fcf6e93fba7/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33745
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 20:20 ---
There is another bug (accepts-invalid):
integer, intent(out) :: jp(2,*)
jp(3,2:4)=0
which is not diagnosed at compile time.
The wrong-code bug is fixed by the followed patch.
Index: trans-array.c
