--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33749
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01237.html
--
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 22:20
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Subject: Bug number PR33749
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01237.html
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-23 08:20 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129539
Log:
2007-10-21 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/33749
Paul, can this bug be closed as FIXED or is
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-21 18:10 ---
Subject: Bug 33749
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 21 18:10:00 2007
New Revision: 129539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129539
Log:
2007-10-21 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 12:36
---
(In reply to comment #3)
You're right. The assignment even produces the temporary for the lhs index
that it should. Now why on earth does this happen in 64bit mode an not in
32bit??
Sometimes, the
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 04:26 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
You're right. The assignment even produces the temporary for the lhs index
that it should. Now why on earth does this happen in 64bit mode an not in
32bit??
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 15:18 ---
I want to add that I cannot reproduce it on x86-64/Linux with -m64 -- only with
-m32. Other than that, I agree that this is a bug.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-12 15:23 ---
The same on PPC Darwin: pr33749 with -m64 gives the expected result, but
pr33686 gives the same result for 32 and 64 bit modes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33749
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 19:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The same on PPC Darwin: pr33749 with -m64 gives the expected result, but
pr33686 gives the same result for 32 and 64 bit modes.
Tobias and Dominique,
You're right. The assignment even
