[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-12-10 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-28 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-04-28 17:14:05 UTC --- Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and neither is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other. AFAICT this is

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2012-08-12 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2012-08-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2008-04-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-20 07:31 --- Note: Fortran 2008 is better in this regard: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ff402a68a17d2be9 Here is the relevant text from the current draft, 08-007r2. Reference is sec.

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2008-04-17 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 07:30 --- More talk about that recently: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ff402a68a17d2be9/543de4c347caa9d0 This is well described in the last example of C.11.2. -- fxcoudert at

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-12-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 12:33 --- Related bug: PR 20896 (esp. test case in PR 20896 comment 0). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 10:32 --- Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and neither is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other. Does this mean, though, that a subroutine is or is not distinguishable from a variable?

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-11-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-07 11:02 --- Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and neither is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other. Does this mean, though, that a subroutine is or is not distinguishable from a