--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 12:16 ---
Subject: Bug 34133
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Nov 30 12:16:35 2007
New Revision: 130535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130535
Log:
2007-11-20 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 16:04 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0).
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-20 10:55 ---
Assign bug to myself. I have a patch, which does:
- rejects bind(c) with -std=f2003 for internal function (was missing!)
- Allows for -std=gnu bind(c) for internal procedures, but
rejects bind(c,name=...)
- Rejects
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-20 14:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR34133
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01062.html
--
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 21:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
i don't think this constraint exists in F08 (at least i cannot find it).
You are right. However, there is still a constrain. Fortran 2003 has:
C1236 (R1225) A proc-language-binding-spec
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 21:27 ---
Ok. Found it in 15.5.2 Binding labels for procedures of the Fortran 2008
draft with the expected wording:
If a procedure has the BIND attribute with no NAME= specifier, and the
procedure is not a dummy procedure,
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-20 05:04 ---
Subject: Bug number PR34133
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00956.html
--
