--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-24 13:18 ---
Subject: Bug 34192
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 24 13:18:27 2007
New Revision: 130396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130396
Log:
2007-11-24 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-23 21:50 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0). I do not indent to backport it to GCC 4.2.x; but I
can be convince otherwise.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-23 20:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 34192
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01240.html
--
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-23 21:03 ---
Subject: Bug 34192
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Nov 23 21:03:48 2007
New Revision: 130383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130383
Log:
2007-11-23 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 16:27 ---
Seemingly the problem was introduced by the following patch, which fixed
another NEAREST problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-10/msg00249.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrevision=117584
2006-10-09
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 16:11 ---
I believe there is indeed a bug in gfortran. The standard says that the the
nearest different machine-representable number is returned.
However, gfortran returns a number which is not representable (denormal or
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 17:08 ---
Regarding the range check: We need to disable the check for denormal numbers;
as overflow etc. cannot occur, this boils down to check only for NaN.
Regarding the result, I think we have a problem with MPFR. The
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 18:05 ---
Hmm, this does not seem to be easily possible in MPFR.
http://websympa.loria.fr/wwsympa/arc/mpfr/2007-11/msg00026.html
Possible implementation (as of 2005) by Tobias Schlüter:
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 19:00 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Created an attachment (id=14609)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14609action=view) [edit]
Patch (reverted Rev 117584) plus test case
Initial implementation by reverting
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 18:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=14609)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14609action=view)
Patch (reverted Rev 117584) plus test case
Initial implementation by reverting Rev. 117584 as suggested by Steve.
10 matches
Mail list logo
