[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2021-11-05 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should be fixed now.  I added paragraphs about both C++ compatibility and how
to link.

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2021-11-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:452a0afbace650d7c0f2811e2b47e62dcd18e1fd

commit r12-4959-g452a0afbace650d7c0f2811e2b47e62dcd18e1fd
Author: Sandra Loosemore 
Date:   Fri Nov 5 14:01:03 2021 -0700

Fortran: Add more documentation for mixed-language programming [PR35276]

2021-11-05  Sandra Loosemore  

PR fortran/35276

gcc/fortran/
* gfortran.texi (Mixed-Language Programming): Talk about C++,
and how to link.

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2021-11-03 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |sandra at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, it looks to me like we currently do not document exactly how to link
mixed-language programs, although chapter 7 does cover related concepts like
what you have to do to initialize libgfortran if you are linking e.g. a fortran
library with a main in some other language.  I think this topic does belong in
chapter 7 and not any other part of the manual, and that we should not close
it.  I'll add it to my queue.

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2021-11-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||juergen.reuter at desy dot de,
   ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager  ---
Sandra Loosemore and Martin Liska have been discussing how to update the
fortran docs on gcc-patches lately; cc-ing them

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2019-06-29 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> > > It seems that at least Thomas and Dominique believe that this can be 
> > > closed.
> > 
> > with which status?
> 
> We need to extend that chapter with the new status for gcc 9 after
> Paul's fixes have all gone in.
> 
> After that, I we should close this as FIXED.

Have Paul's fixes all gone in yet?

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2019-03-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

Thomas Koenig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig  ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> > It seems that at least Thomas and Dominique believe that this can be closed.
> 
> with which status?

We need to extend that chapter with the new status for gcc 9 after
Paul's fixes have all gone in.

After that, I we should close this as FIXED.

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2019-01-21 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> It seems that at least Thomas and Dominique believe that this can be closed.

with which status?

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2019-01-21 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

Jürgen Reuter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de

--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
It seems that at least Thomas and Dominique believe that this can be closed.

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2017-10-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> I think we can close this. The preferred way is to
> use C interop. Anybody mind if I close this?

Or "is there important things to add to 7 Mixed-Language Programming?".

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2017-10-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276

Thomas Koenig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING
 CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig  ---
I think we can close this. The preferred way is to
use C interop. Anybody mind if I close this?

[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2008-02-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276



[Bug fortran/35276] Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs

2008-02-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-21 10:07 
---
I've posted explanations and examples on comp.lang.fortran that might be used
as a starting point:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/msg/a62f1aa0c1592838

Linking to C++ and other languages might also be interesting. Also, when
documentation about our calling conventions is written, we can link these two
parts.

PS: Maybe we should also add information on how to create shared libraries of
gfortran-compiled Fortran code? Or is that too generic to be in our doc?


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-21 10:07:41
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276