[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 07:32 --- Subject: Bug 35864 Author: pault Date: Thu May 1 07:31:28 2008 New Revision: 134847 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134847 Log: 2008-05-01 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/35864 * expr.c (scalarize_intrinsic_call): Reorder identification of array argument so that if one is not found a segfault does not occur. Return FAILURE if all scalar arguments. PR fortran/35780 * expr.c (scalarize_intrinsic_call): Identify which argument is an array and use that as the template. (check_init_expr): Remove tests that first argument is an array in the call to scalarize_intrinsic_call. 2008-05-01 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/35780 * gfortran.dg/simplify_argN_1.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simplify_argN_1.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/expr.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-15 19:41 --- Subject: Bug 35864 Author: pault Date: Tue Apr 15 19:40:33 2008 New Revision: 134329 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134329 Log: 2008-04-15 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/35864 * expr.c (scalarize_intrinsic_call): Reorder identification of array argument so that if one is not found a segfault does not occur. Return FAILURE if all scalar arguments. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-15 19:43 --- Finally, I have managed to deal with this. Sorry it took so long Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-11 09:54 --- It's mine, it's mine! I even posted a fix for it last night but have not had a chance to commit it. I'll try to do so over the weekend. As Jerry remarks, it sometimes goes away; such as on my x86_ia64/FC8, on which I developed the patch that caused the regression. Sorry about the problem. Cheers Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-04-08 00:12:28 |2008-04-11 09:54:39 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-11 12:23 --- It's mine, it's mine! I even posted a fix for it last night but have not had a chance to commit it. I'll try to do so over the weekend. The mentioned patch was posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-04/msg00107.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 11:46 --- I see it on x86-64 Linux clearly enough and with -m32 and -m64. I think Paul removed a check that we have to put back in. Whereas I do not see it, neither with -m32 nor -m64 on x86-64-linux (openSUSE Factory); not even using valgrind. This is with gfortran 4.4.0 20080409 (experimental) [trunk revision 134131] -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 23:47 --- After a clean bootstrap (empty build directory) I get a pass. I suspect we have a dependency somewhere not getting taken car of. Hans-Peter can you try this and see whta happends. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 23:57 --- Try what? I always start with a clean slate; an empty build directory! Perhaps you mean something else? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-10 00:00 --- I haven't tried it myself, but since we're in voodoo-debug mode, try --enable-checking=yes,valgrind. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-04-08 15:14 --- I don't see the failure on (powerpc|i686)-apple-darwin9 nor in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-04/msg00549.html. So it does not seem to affect all platforms. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08 20:05 --- I see it on x86-64 Linux clearly enough and with -m32 and -m64. I think Paul removed a check that we have to put back in. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90 for cris-elf
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2008-04-07 23:49 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90 for cris-elf On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 23:18 +, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: With r133964, this test passed. With 133965 I see: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault It is not target specific. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
[Bug fortran/35864] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133965 broke gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90 for cris-elf
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08 00:12 --- (In reply to comment #1) It is not target specific. Ah, I was a bit worried that it was. Since the failure had been there all day, and noone have entered a matching PR or mentioning it on the lists, I just *assumed* that it was... ;) -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-08 00:12:28 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864
