https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Oct 4 10:18:07 2014
New Revision: 215887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215887root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/36534
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
Bug 36534 depends on bug 37173, which changed state.
Bug 37173 Summary: Check whether intrinsic assignment between character kind=1
/ 4 is allowed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37173
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 14:31
---
Assuming PR37173 is correct, isn't this example invalid anyway (as already
noted by Tobias in #4)?
Instead, it should probably be written as:
CHARACTER (kind=4,len=*) MY_STRING4(1:3)
PARAMETER ( MY_STRING4 =
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 04:31
---
With current trunk (4.6) I see this:
$ valgrind --leak-check=full f951 parameter_array_init_4.f90
--- snip ---
==12209== 48 bytes in 6 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 21 of 352
==12209==at
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 18:28 ---
$ cat huhu.f90
CHARACTER (kind=4,len=*) MY_STRING4(1:3), my_string_s4
PARAMETER ( MY_STRING4 = (/ A , B, C /) )
end
$ gfortran huhu.f90
huhu.f90:1.54:
CHARACTER (kind=4,len=*) MY_STRING4(1:3), my_string_s4
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 18:54 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
It looks like this is fixed. I could not reproduce the problem.
I still get this problem:
$ cat fhjfff.f90
CHARACTER (kind=4,len=*) MY_STRING4(1:3)
PARAMETER ( MY_STRING4 = (/ A , B, C /)
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 00:16
---
I can not reproduce at all. Can you try an update. Maybe one our patches
recently fixed this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 01:02
---
OK we have a Heisenbug going on here.
Running from Valgrind like this:
valgrind --leak-check=full f951 -pedantic untitled.f
==14463== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==14463== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 06:56
---
It looks like this is fixed. I could not reproduce the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-24 10:38 ---
One could work around the bug: As such conversions are not valid, one just
needs to reject them with -pedantic (cf. PR 37173) ;-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-18 13:28 ---
Note: The test case parameter_array_init_4.f90 (Rev. 137950) now avoids the
conversion by using kind-4 literals. However, the bug itself is still present.
See example in comment #0.
--
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-13 23:06
---
I love that one: Fixed-form is likely to be F77/legacy. Well, the issue is
that I don't think we have a way to tell, from the sym, that it's a internal
conversion function. Maybe the crude way, check if the name
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-14 05:14
---
*** Bug 36535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
