--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 07:31 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Lest anybody is worrying about the patch that I posted, I cannot commit until
tonight or tomorrow morning.
Since my laptop was stolen, I have no means to update my tree nor commit
anything
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 22:25 ---
Subject: Bug 37274
Author: pault
Date: Wed Sep 17 22:23:51 2008
New Revision: 140434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140434
Log:
2008-09-18 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 21:22 ---
I find this behavior very confusing, inconsistent with the concept of scoping
units.
(In reply to comment #7)
I think this should be rejected :
Lahey and deep contemplation agree with you:-)
I am trying to
--- Comment #14 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-01 08:13 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
My point is this:
As you said in your first comment, there is no ambiguity in your code.
vector is defined in only one module which is used when needed in other
modules.
Moreover you
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 10:27 ---
Since I am homing in on a solution, I might as well take it on.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 21:16
---
(In reply to comment #10)
I think your example should be rejected, but it is not like my code, where
smooth_mesh explicitly USEs class_vector. So, I am not sure what's your
point.
My point is this:
As you
--- Comment #12 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 21:52
---
Actually, my comment #7 seems to be more related to bug #36374.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37274
--- Comment #13 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-31 23:34
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Actually, my comment #7 seems to be more related to bug #36374.
No, it's not
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37274
--- Comment #7 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-30 11:27
---
I think this should be rejected :
module class_vector
implicit none
type vector
end type vector
end module class_vector
module tools_math
implicit none
interface lin_interp
function
--- Comment #8 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-30 12:12
---
Created an attachment (id=16171)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16171action=view)
another testcase with comments telling how to get/not get the error
Look at the comments in module
--- Comment #9 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-08-30 12:17
---
Forget comment #8.
I was testing with version 4.3.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37274
--- Comment #10 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-08-30 14:00 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I think this should be rejected :
I think your example should be rejected, but it is not like my code, where
smooth_mesh explicitly USEs class_vector. So, I am not sure what's your point.
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 08:54 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Does it have anything to do with 36374?
Salvatore,
I don't think so, since this PR is a regression. Anyway, I'll take a look at
them both together in a few days. I'm still not
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 15:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=16163)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16163action=view)
A reduced version of the testcase
I still do not feel much the wiser - making vector visible in class motion
makes
14 matches
Mail list logo
