[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 23:17 --- Subject: Bug 38665 Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 4 23:17:37 2009 New Revision: 143064 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143064 Log: 2009-01-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/38665 * gfo

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 17:59 --- (In reply to comment #6) > > In the mean time, I know how to apply a fix along the lines of 1. > Ok, then; go for (1). I have nothing to propose. I have just realised that the matching can be eliminated, although I

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-03 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 01:02 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Mikael, > > > Now the solutions: > > (1) Add some conditions to the if before to prevent executing this. > > (2) Remove the gfc_match_whatever that has nothing to do in resolve.c and > >

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 23:01 --- Mikael, > Now the solutions: > (1) Add some conditions to the if before to prevent executing this. > (2) Remove the gfc_match_whatever that has nothing to do in resolve.c and > find > a better way (yes, I prefer (2

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38665

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 23:22 --- This is a Fortran FE bug and as such it is P4/P5. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed for 4.4, just that it isn't release critical. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38665

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 23:13 --- failing assert line 4338: 4334 gfc_match_rvalue (&expr); 4335 gfc_clear_error (); 4336 gfc_buffer_error (0); 4337 4338 gcc_assert (expr && sym == expr->symtree->n.sym); 4

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 22:07 --- Created an attachment (id=17006) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17006&action=view) reduced testcase -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.3.2 Known to work||4.4.0 Target

[Bug fortran/38665] [4.4 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2008-12-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 21:15 --- Created an attachment (id=17004) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17004&action=view) failing test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38665