--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-04 01:08
---
No further replies, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 22:33
---
Is this still an issue?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-14 20:25
---
Unfortunately I failed to apply the patch to both version 4.4.0 and 4.3.0 so I
am stuck here. It was probably written for some specific version, but I don't
know which one
dirac:~/local/src/gcc-4.3.0/fixincludes$
--- Comment #15 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-10 19:52
---
I tried the first suggested option, on building gcc-4.4.0. It seems to work but
now it fails later with the message:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:305: multiple definition of `atof'
--- Comment #16 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-10 20:27 ---
You may want to have a look at pr29867.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39971
--- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 20:11
---
Another thing you might want to do is change libgfortran.h in your source to
replace this:
#if HAVE_COMPLEX_H
# include complex.h
#else
#define complex __complex__
#endif
with this:
# include complex.h
#undef
--- Comment #13 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 20:27 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
don't know how to use it to compile gcc being a normal user (no root
privileges) without scrambling everything else. Any help on this direction?
Thanks
export
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 14:08 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
I couldn't find any other gmp or mpfr in the system.
Also tried using the system's ld and as (both version 2.11.2) but the same
error pops up (see below).
Using
--- Comment #6 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-01 14:57 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Well... I already read the installation instructions and know them almost by
hard... and a bit more. At the web page it says:
First, we highly recommend that GCC be built into a separate
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 15:04
---
What's the content of your generated file kinds.h? (It's in the target
libgfortran directory)? I suspect that the generation of kinds.h fails but the
Makefile continues, and the content of kinds.h makes it error
--- Comment #8 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-01 15:25 ---
I think that it fails in building libgfortran.h
This is the last part of the output:
.
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home2/gdb/local/gcc-4.4.0-obj/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libssp'
make[3]: Leaving directory
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 15:44
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I think that it fails in building libgfortran.h
libgfortran.h is not built, it's a source file.
There was one question only in my comment: What's the content of your generated
file
--- Comment #10 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-01 15:59
---
dirac:~/local/gcc-4.4.0-obj$ cat ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran/kinds.h
typedef int8_t GFC_INTEGER_1;
typedef uint8_t GFC_UINTEGER_1;
typedef GFC_INTEGER_1 GFC_LOGICAL_1;
#define HAVE_GFC_LOGICAL_1
#define
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 16:12
---
Oh, I think I see. Do you have a really old glibc? What happens if you use a
newer one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39971
--- Comment #12 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-01 17:14
---
Yes, glibc is old:
dirac:~/local/gcc-4.4.0-obj$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.1.3, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 1992, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 Free Software
--- Comment #2 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-04-30 16:24 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Change Severity to normal. Fortran bugs are never major.
AFAIK, there will be no further releases from the gcc-4.1.x branch,
so it is highly unlikely that this bug will be fixed.
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 16:35 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Change Severity to normal. Fortran bugs are never major.
AFAIK, there will be no further releases from the gcc-4.1.x branch,
so it is highly unlikely that
--- Comment #4 from gustcr at yahoo dot com dot ar 2009-05-01 00:10 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I couldn't find any other gmp or mpfr in the system.
Also tried using the system's ld and as (both version 2.11.2) but the same
error pops up (see below).
Using ps ax I checked that the
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 05:52 ---
Change Severity to normal. Fortran bugs are never major.
AFAIK, there will be no further releases from the gcc-4.1.x branch,
so it is highly unlikely that this bug will be fixed. gcc-4.4.0
was released a week or so
19 matches
Mail list logo
