--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 16:46 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Note that I did not apply the patch to 4.4 as I said that I would. What do
you
think?
4.4 is sufficiently different from 4.5/6 that I am closing this as fixed.
Paul
--
pault at
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 14:05 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
I guess everything is fixed now. Can we close this PR?
Ping?
Note that I did not apply the patch to 4.4 as I said that I would. What do you
think?
Cheers
--- Comment #9 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 20:30 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I guess everything is fixed now. Can we close this PR?
Ping?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 09:24 ---
I guess everything is fixed now. Can we close this PR?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40591
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 09:48 ---
Well. I suppose that I should accept the bug :-)
I will commit the fix to 4.4 over the weekend, so please try to test it to
destruction on 4.5.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-08 11:47 ---
It seems that gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_21.f90 is failing on i686-pc-linux-gnu and
Intel64(?), see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-07/msg00755.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2009-07/msg00078.html
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 12:37 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
It seems that gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_21.f90 is failing on i686-pc-linux-gnu and
Intel64(?), see
I can - somewhat - reproduce it. It does not fail but valgrind shows
(x86-64-linux and
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 13:28 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
That is solved by adding:
i = 0
to subroutine test (while any other number causes the abortion).
Indeed - that was in the test originally; I do not know what happened to it.
I'll put
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-08 13:31 ---
pr40683 is a duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40591
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 04:38 ---
Subject: Bug 40591
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jul 8 04:38:06 2009
New Revision: 149362
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149362
Log:
2008-07-08 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 05:01 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The following program fails with:
procedure(sub), pointer :: pptr2
1
Error: Interface 'sub' of procedure 'pptr2' at (1) must be explicit
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
