[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-21 08:57 ---
Subject: Bug 41706

Author: janus
Date: Wed Oct 21 08:56:56 2009
New Revision: 153049

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153049
Log:
2009-10-21  Janus Weil  ja...@gcc.gnu.org

PR fortran/41706
PR fortran/41766
* match.c (select_type_set_tmp): Set flavor for temporary.
* resolve.c (resolve_class_typebound_call): Correctly resolve actual
arguments.


2009-10-21  Janus Weil  ja...@gcc.gnu.org

PR fortran/41706
PR fortran/41766
* gfortran.dg/class_9.f03: Extended test case.
* gfortran.dg/select_type_7.f03: New test case.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_type_7.f03
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_9.f03


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-21 09:01 ---
Fixed with r153049. Closing.


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-20 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-20 11:30 ---
Reopening. Salvatore's code still fails with the same error, which is due to
the analogous case with a subroutine:

module m

type :: t
contains
  procedure, nopass :: a
  procedure, nopass :: b
end type

contains

  subroutine a (x)
real :: x
print *,x
  end subroutine

  real function b ()
b = 3.
  end function

  subroutine s
class(t),allocatable :: x
real :: r
allocate(x)
call x%a(x%b())   ! fails
  end subroutine

end


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|FIXED   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-20 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com  
2009-10-20 12:19 ---
Subject: Re:  [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument 
of another TBP

Oh bother!  I completely forgot to test the subroutine branch - thanks Janus

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:


 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-20 11:30 ---
 Reopening. Salvatore's code still fails with the same error, which is due to
 the analogous case with a subroutine:

 module m

 type :: t
 contains
  procedure, nopass :: a
  procedure, nopass :: b
 end type

 contains

  subroutine a (x)
    real :: x
    print *,x
  end subroutine

  real function b ()
    b = 3.
  end function

  subroutine s
    class(t),allocatable :: x
    real :: r
    allocate(x)
    call x%a(x%b())   ! fails
  end subroutine

 end


 --

 janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
 
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-20 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-20 12:29 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Oh bother!  I completely forgot to test the subroutine branch - thanks Janus

But in your patch you do the argument resolution both in resolve_class_compcall
and resolve_class_typebound_call, which should take care of type-bound
functions *and* subroutines, shouldn't it? Therefore I don't see why it still
fails for subroutines ...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-20 04:17 ---
Subject: Bug 41706

Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 20 04:16:02 2009
New Revision: 153004

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153004
Log:
2009-10-20  Paul Thomas  pa...@gcc.gnu.org

PR fortran/41706
* resolve.c (resolve_arg_exprs): New function.
(resolve_class_compcall): Call the above.
(resolve_class_typebound_call): The same.

2009-10-20  Paul Thomas  pa...@gcc.gnu.org

PR fortran/41706
* gfortran.dg/class_9 : New test.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_9.f03
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706

[Bug fortran/41706] [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument of another TBP

2009-10-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-20 04:52 ---
Fixed on trunk.

Thanks for the report!

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706