--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 15:51 ---
The runtime problem and the obsolete comment in the manual are fixed now. So
the only issue left is the wrong static declaration reported in comment #3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42072
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 16:08 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
So the only issue left is the wrong static declaration reported in comment #3.
This is now PR 42122. Closing this one.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-18 13:25 ---
Subject: Bug 42072
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 18 13:24:54 2009
New Revision: 154292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154292
Log:
2009-11-18 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 12:00 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
So inside MAIN__ we have:
static void setpointer (integer(kind=4) (*T3af) (integer(kind=4)));
setpointer (ptype);
That is wrong, unless I am missing a reference type somewhere.
Yes,
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-16 22:51 ---
Side-note on C_F_PROCPOINTER: The manual claims that ...
Due to the currently lacking support of procedure pointers in GNU Fortran this
function is not fully operable.
... which is a dirty lie.
--
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-16 22:55 ---
Proposed fix:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 154189)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(working copy)
@@
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-16 22:59 ---
call setpointer(ptype)
is being converted into:
setpointer.1481 ();
So inside MAIN__ we have:
static void setpointer (integer(kind=4) (*T3af) (integer(kind=4)));
setpointer (ptype);
That is wrong, unless I
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-16 23:00 ---
Wrong buttons :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
