--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 17:04 ---
Subject: Bug 42999
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Feb 23 17:02:26 2010
New Revision: 157010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157010
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2010-02-23 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-10 08:52 ---
closing as fixed after the commit by Jerry DeLisle
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 03:31
---
Subject: Bug 42999
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Feb 10 03:31:02 2010
New Revision: 156642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156642
Log:
2010-02-09 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 03:34
---
Subject: Bug 42999
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Feb 10 03:34:33 2010
New Revision: 156643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156643
Log:
2010-02-09 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.0
Known to work||4.4.2
Target
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 15:01 ---
I think it regressed between 2010-01-07-r155688 and 2010-01-10-r155780
Jerry, I think that is due to your initializer patch:
r155769 | jvdelisle | 2010-01-09 18:47:04 +0100 (Sat, 09 Jan 2010) | 18 lines
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-08 15:02 ---
The code compiles also with fortran-exp revision 156589.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42999
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42999
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 03:41
---
I was being a bit too aggressive. The following patch fixes it. The problem
does not exist on fortran-exp. I removed my original patch from the branch
since handling of constructors is being revamped completely.