--- Comment #17 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2010-06-10 07:22 ---
vanilla gcc-4.4.x shows the same behavior if you were to use the same configure
options as Gentoo. specifically, --disable-checking seems to cause this.
i dont have the ability to re-open this bug since i didnt file it
--- Comment #16 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-27 19:42
---
Closing then.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-03-28 23:01 ---
Yes, just close it. I'm waiting the gentoo folks to find out which patch was
causing this error. It was so slow there...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-27 19:11 ---
Can we close this one, guys?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-27 21:22 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Can we close this one, guys?
Paul
Sure. I think that we've demonstrated that
it is a gentoo issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Comment #9 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 16:06 ---
Here's a brief run with valgrind 3.5.0: I had to recompile glibc (2.10.1) with
splitdebug feature in Gentoo OS for it to work.
~/toys/gfortran/ch10 $ valgrind
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.3/f951
--- Comment #10 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 16:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=19970)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19970action=view)
valgrind --leak-check=full output
I attach this as a more verbose report. Not sure if it is of any use.
--
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 17:36 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Created an attachment (id=19970)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19970action=view) [edit]
valgrind --leak-check=full output
I attach this as a more verbose report.
--- Comment #12 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 18:50 ---
I'm positive that the libraries used for compilation and running are the same.
The package was built on my own computer. I'm posting this bug at gentoo
bugzilla (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306833) . Still
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 10:46 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
There are no changes if I compiled with *.f90 instead of *.F90 extension.
Another idea - can you compile with valgrind? That is:
gfortran -v file.f90
find the line containing the call to
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 08:54 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
troutmask:sgk[209] gfc43 -o z j.f90 ./z | od -t x1
0000a 69 6e 76 61 72 73 31 6d 20 3a 20 65 6e 74 65
02072 20 6a 64 74 73 65 74 3d 0a
--- Comment #3 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 15:52 ---
Here's my activity log. It's using gcc 4.4.3 that I just compiled yesterday.
It's still yielding char(0) instead of char(10). Weird.
~/toys/gfortran/ch10 $ cat testme5.F90
module blahblah
character(len=1), parameter
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 17:16 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Here's my activity log. It's using gcc 4.4.3 that I just compiled yesterday.
It's still yielding char(0) instead of char(10). Weird.
Can you add the -fdump-tree-original option and post
--- Comment #5 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 17:49 ---
Here's the dump content. Indeed it misses the \n stuff.
~/toys/gfortran/ch10 $ cat testme5.F90.003t.original
testme3 ()
{
static integer(kind=4) options.0[8] = {68, 255, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1};
_gfortran_set_options (8,
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 18:29 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Here's the dump content. Indeed it misses the \n stuff.
~/toys/gfortran/ch10 $ cat testme5.F90.003t.original
Can you rename the file to testme5.f90 and try again?
The .F90 extension will
--- Comment #7 from wirawan0 at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 18:38 ---
There are no changes if I compiled with *.f90 instead of *.F90 extension.
Wirawan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43146
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 21:19 ---
You may need to update to a newer version of gfortran.
troutmask:sgk[207] gfc4x -o z j.f90 ./z | od -t x1
0000a 69 6e 76 61 72 73 31 6d 20 3a 20 65 6e 74 65
02072 20 6a 64 74 73
17 matches
Mail list logo
