[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2015-10-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2013-06-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2013-06-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2013-06-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #15) (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) Remaining [...] is to warn on an unused namelist. I think this will involve

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09 00:08:24 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Nov 9 00:08:20 2010 New Revision: 166461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166461 Log: 2010-11-08 Jerry

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 15:22:29 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Nov 3 15:22:25 2010 New Revision: 166252 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166252 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 15:27:53 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Nov 3 15:27:48 2010 New Revision: 166253 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166253 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 15:44:35 UTC --- The patch in comment 7 and 8 adds a run-time warning (with -fcheck=bounds) if a string in a namelist gets truncated. TODO: Comment 0, namely: Don't warn that

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 17:47:51 UTC --- This patchlet gets rid of the bogus warning. All that remains is to check that namelists are used or not. Also note that we do not now check to see if

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 04:29:19 UTC --- OK, I got back to this. I will submit a patch shortly. I now do this: At line 9 of file pr43899.f90 (unit = 7, file = 'example.nml') Fortran runtime

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-05-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-04 01:56 --- What I am thinking of is a warning if a quoted string is terminated by an end-of-line and there is no closing quote. I would like to put this behind -Wcharacter-truncation which will be picked up with -Wall.

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-05-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-04 04:11 --- What about this? $ gfc -fbounds-check pr43899.f90 $ ./a.out NMLIST NML_STRING='123456789' / At line 9 of file pr43899.f90 (unit = 7, file = 'example.nml') Fortran runtime error: Namelist object

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-05-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-04 05:53 --- (In reply to comment #4) What about this? $ gfc -fbounds-check pr43899.f90 $ ./a.out NMLIST NML_STRING='123456789' / At line 9 of file pr43899.f90 (unit = 7, file = 'example.nml') Fortran runtime error:

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-04-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 19:05 --- Well in a sense it is unused. Regardless, adding a warning for the truncated string, the real issue, is straightforward and I will do so. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-04-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 20:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) Well in a sense it is unused. Well, but only in a sense - in the example a value is assigned to and then printed ... Regardless, adding a warning for the truncated string, the real