[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2015-12-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2015-12-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 12 19:00:32 2015 New Revision: 231585 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231585=gcc=rev Log: 2014-12-12 Tobias Burnus gcc/fortran PR fortran/45859

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2015-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2015-10-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2011-08-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25 14:28:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) is supposed to be valid according the following IR. A modified program which uses call sub (x(10:)) is unambiguously valid.

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2011-07-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 20:16:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) See F08/0040 at http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-006A.txt STATUS: Passed by J3 letter ballot My comment is odd. First, the

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2011-07-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 20:21:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Meeting 193 ( http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/193/ ): - 10-229 has an edit which allows the program (cf. quote in comment 0) -

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

2011-03-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-27 16:03:41 UTC --- See F08/0040 at http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-006A.txt STATUS: Passed by J3 letter ballot