http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 17:24:23 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Jan 18 17:24:14 2012
New Revision: 183277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183277
Log:
Insert ChangeLog entry that should have b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16 18:22:20 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jan 16 18:22:16 2012
New Revision: 183217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183217
Log:
2012-01-16 Zydrunas Gimbutas
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-10
00:12:58 UTC ---
Done.
Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl
2011-11-07 19:49:39 UTC ---
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
> --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07
> 19:25:32 UTC ---
> Zydrunas and I have successfully comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07
19:25:32 UTC ---
Zydrunas and I have successfully completed the copyright assignment process,
and we're ready to move forward with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
20:30:44 UTC ---
Super! If you have not already figured it out. We are really short on help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15
19:46:45 UTC ---
Just requested the assignment forms. I'll let you know when we've returned
them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-15 16:59:41 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:06PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any
> issues on this?
The patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
16:40:58 UTC ---
Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any
issues on this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-15 16:02:17 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:36PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I have looked over the patch. I need to do some tests and I have about three
> bugs in front of this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15
14:53:52 UTC ---
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
Andreas Kloeckner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23859|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-05
02:12:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
> This is the number one reason why these options (including the
> current 3 [1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-03 21:14:41 UTC ---
On 04/03/2011 12:49 PM, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03
> 19:49:
On 04/03/2011 12:49 PM, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03
19:49:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
There is already -fdefault-real-8, -fdefault-integer-8, and
-fdefault-double-8. This is already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-03 20:33:12 UTC ---
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03
> 19:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03
19:49:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is already -fdefault-real-8, -fdefault-integer-8, and
> -fdefault-double-8. This is already 3 too many hacks. Adding
> an additional 7 options is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03
18:05:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23859
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23859
patch v1
23 matches
Mail list logo