[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2012-01-19 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2012-01-19 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2012-01-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 17:24:23 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 18 17:24:14 2012 New Revision: 183277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183277 Log: Insert ChangeLog entry that should have b

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2012-01-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2012-01-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16 18:22:20 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Jan 16 18:22:16 2012 New Revision: 183217 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183217 Log: 2012-01-16 Zydrunas Gimbutas A

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-11-09 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-10 00:12:58 UTC --- Done. Andreas

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-11-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-07 19:49:39 UTC --- On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote: > --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07 > 19:25:32 UTC --- > Zydrunas and I have successfully comp

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-11-07 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-07 19:25:32 UTC --- Zydrunas and I have successfully completed the copyright assignment process, and we're ready to move forward with this patch.

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:30:44 UTC --- Super! If you have not already figured it out. We are really short on help.

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15 19:46:45 UTC --- Just requested the assignment forms. I'll let you know when we've returned them.

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-15 16:59:41 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:06PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any > issues on this? The patch

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 16:40:58 UTC --- Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any issues on this?

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-15 16:02:17 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:36PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I have looked over the patch. I need to do some tests and I have about three > bugs in front of this

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15 14:53:52 UTC --- Ping?

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-04 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 Andreas Kloeckner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23859|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-04 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-05 02:12:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote: > This is the number one reason why these options (including the > current 3 [1]

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread jvdelisle at frontier dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-03 21:14:41 UTC --- On 04/03/2011 12:49 PM, inform at tiker dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 > > --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03 > 19:49:

Re: [Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 04/03/2011 12:49 PM, inform at tiker dot net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03 19:49:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) There is already -fdefault-real-8, -fdefault-integer-8, and -fdefault-double-8. This is already

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-03 20:33:12 UTC --- On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 > > --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03 > 19:

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03 19:49:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > There is already -fdefault-real-8, -fdefault-integer-8, and > -fdefault-double-8. This is already 3 too many hacks. Adding > an additional 7 options is

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-03 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-03 18:05:10 UTC --- Created attachment 23859 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23859 patch v1