http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-30
11:43:24 UTC ---
The order apparently changed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=114406
which doesn't change the order actually, but only wouldn't overwrite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-30
12:30:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 24645
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24645
gcc47-pr49586.patch
Untested fix for the order.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-30
13:57:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Untested fix for the order.
For the example of comment 0, gfortran + patch gives the gfortran 4.1 et al.
result.
For the example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-30
16:10:18 UTC ---
Unfortunately, this patch breaks gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/data.f90
compilation, it fails with a cryptic error.
No idea if it is a bug in the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49586
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-30
17:28:48 UTC ---
Unfortunately, this patch breaks gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/data.f90
compilation, it fails with a cryptic error.
Confirmed. A reduced test is
