https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:11:07AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote:
> bardeau ~> cat test.f90
> subroutine sav
> integer :: save1
> save1 =
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #18 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #17)
> I just realized that your code isn't even close to conforming.
>
> subroutine sav
> integer :: save1
> save1 = something wrong
> end subroutine sav
>
> What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #17 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
> Compiling the test in comment 10 gives now
>
> pr51991_2.f90:3:7:
>
> 3 | save1 = something wrong
> | 1
> Error: Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 06:03:42PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
>
> --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Compiling the test in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Compiling the test in comment 10 gives now
pr51991_2.f90:3:7:
3 | save1 = something wrong
| 1
Error: Invalid character in name at (1)
pr51991_2.f90:8:6:
8 | data1 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jun 21 16:57:24 2019
New Revision: 272556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272556=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-06-21 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/51991
* decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #10 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-02-08
10:38:42 UTC ---
I checked the gfortran trunk revision 183991 and the bug does not seem to be
fixed. I can also add that the DATA*-named variables give also erroneous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-02-08 16:15:20 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #12 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-02-08
16:22:47 UTC ---
Ok, I did not realize that this patch was just a fix candidate.
This bug is not a problem to me, so there is no hurry.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-25
12:39:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I wonder why it does not work for you with GCC 4.7 2011-11-19.
I do not recall any issue, but it might have been some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-25
12:59:39 UTC ---
Well, ok, the 2 tests are just different and should raise different errors.
Your original test gives
pr51991.f90:11.11:
j = a%j
1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #5 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-25
13:19:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Well, ok, the 2 tests are just different and should raise different errors.
Your original test gives
pr51991.f90:11.11:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #6 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-25
13:29:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26461
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26461
Correct version this time.
Sorry, previous version had no problem. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-25
13:32:34 UTC ---
... I do observe the error reported in my first message with gfortran trunk
...
I am quite confused: in order to have 'savej' in the error message,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #8 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-25
13:36:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
... I do observe the error reported in my first message with gfortran trunk
...
I am quite confused: in order to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
19 matches
Mail list logo
