[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-03-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-20 11:39:31 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Mar 20 11:34:56 2013 New Revision: 196821 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196821root=gccview=rev Log: Don't XFAIL

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-03-18 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-03-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-03-18 11:04:58 UTC --- Since very recently (between 20130313 and 20130315) gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution started to XPASS not only at -O0/-O1, but at every optimisation level.

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-02-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-02-12 18:21:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Please also split the testcase - it contains several tests and only one has invalid overflow. Actually there are

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-02-03 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-02-04 00:16:44 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-02-01 13:59:11 UTC ---

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2013-02-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-02-01 13:59:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Thus, I close the bug as INVALID. ... in wich case could you, please, update the testcase to be valid and

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-11-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-18 14:33:49 UTC --- ... in wich case could you, please, update the testcase to be valid and remove the XFAIL I introduced? I cannot commit anything, but the

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-11-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-23 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-23 13:55:24 UTC --- Thus, I close the bug as INVALID. ... in wich case could you, please, update the testcase to be valid and remove the XFAIL I introduced? Honza

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-17 09:22:41 UTC --- 7.1.5.2.4 Evaluation of numeric intrinsic operations The execution of any numeric operation whose result is not defined by the arithmetic used by the

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-17 10:41:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) 7.1.5.2.4 Evaluation of numeric intrinsic operations The execution of any numeric operation whose result is not defined by

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-17 18:51:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) but you'll see that at least one person disagrees with both former J3 members. The only way to get a definite answer is

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-17 19:21:22 UTC --- On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:51:08PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The Standard does not define 'incremented' and

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-15 11:49:08 UTC --- If Fortran requires i to be HUGE(i) + 1 after the loop body then what does it say about the overflow? That is, what would be valid at the end of