[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 11:23:28 UTC --- Further compactified version of the test case: module assoc_err_m implicit none type :: foo_t contains procedure :: func_1 generic :: func =

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 13:40:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) regtesting now ... Somewhat expected, this fails on: FAIL: gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 13:56:03 UTC --- Here is an improved patch, which hopefully should be free of testsuite regressions (will re-check): Index: gcc/fortran/parse.c

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 15:46:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Here is an improved patch, which hopefully should be free of testsuite regressions (will re-check): It is. However, I think there is a

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 17:13:22 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Nov 4 17:13:16 2012 New Revision: 193136 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193136 Log: 2012-11-04 Janus Weil

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55199] [OOP] Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with generic member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199 --- Comment #9 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2012-11-04 18:01:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Fixed with r193136. Closing. Thanks for reporting this! Hey, thanks for fixing it so quickly -- you never cease