[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.7.4   |4.8.4

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574

--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
 Tell me, why was your patch never applied? 

You answered that question at the next line. ;-)

 As far as I can see, nobody even
 reviewed it - is that right?
 
I believe so.  This bug ceased to matter much after it was fixed on mainline.

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574

Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
 This is fixed on trunk (upcoming 4.9.0).
 
 As Tobias' fix is somewhat intrusive, another patch which I posted at
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-03/msg8.html
 was considered for 4.8 and 4.7 backport.
 
 But this will probably end up with a WONTFIX for the branches.

Hi Mikael,

I have only returned to the fray in the last week or two.

Tell me, why was your patch never applied?  As far as I can see, nobody even
reviewed it - is that right?

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574

Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] C  |[4.7/4.8 Regression] C
   |binding access to c_ptr |binding access to c_ptr
   |type|type

--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is fixed on trunk (upcoming 4.9.0).

As Tobias' fix is somewhat intrusive, another patch which I posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-03/msg8.html
was considered for 4.8 and 4.7 backport.

But this will probably end up with a WONTFIX for the branches.

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574



--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 
18:02:07 UTC ---

Created attachment 29173

  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29173

Lightly tested patch

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574



Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:



   What|Removed |Added



   Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic

   Priority|P3  |P4

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

   Last reconfirmed||2012-12-03

   Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3

Summary|c binding access to c_ptr   |[4.7/4.8 Regression] C

   |type|binding access to c_ptr

   ||type

 Ever Confirmed|0   |1



--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 
15:39:49 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #1)

 Starting at revision 181425, the test compiles without error.



That's the constructor patch (= generic function name might be the same as a

derived-type name) for PR 39427 / PR 37829,

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181425