[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. I am sorry that it has taken so long. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017 New Revision: 251949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/34640 PR

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 08:36:24 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 7 08:36:16 2013 New Revision: 194962 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194962 Log: 2012-01-07

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 18:30:25 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 7 18:30:11 2013 New Revision: 194990 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194990 Log: 2013-01-07

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-06 15:33:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) To the last test case of comment 0: I mentioned this example in the array-descriptor/subpointer PR 40737 to make sure it

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #20 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2013-01-05 13:12:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Sorry for the invalid code: select type (this) should have been: select type (x = this% x) which compiles

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 08:58:05 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194885 Log: 2013-01-03

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 08:59:53 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:59:47 2013 New Revision: 194886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194886 Log: 2014-01-04

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #19 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2013-01-04 23:57:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 Great! I extended the example from comment #10 to

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 12:55:23 UTC --- For another failure, see PR 55854. (In reply to comment #10) I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE. If it doesn't fit here, please

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 13:03:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Proposed patch: Which fails with gfc_typename(): Undefined type for contains subroutine foo type t end type t

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 15:44:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) + c-ts.type = ts-type = BT_VOID; Ups. The ts-type = has to be deleted to fix the failure of comment 13. *

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 16:54:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) type(t), target :: x class(*), pointer :: ptr2 = x TODO: Check whether that would be also valid if x is not

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 23:51:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) The patch has been submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00017.html (In reply to comment #13) C512

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-01 14:09:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE. If it doesn't fit here, please feel free to move it elsewhere. The

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-28 11:22:20 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Dec 28 11:22:14 2012 New Revision: 194743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194743 Log: 2012-12-28

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-28 12:26:15 UTC --- I think all issues have been fixed, except for the sub-pointer issue, i.e. last example of comment 0 - see also comment 6. The following modified

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 17:27:06 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 22 17:27:03 2012 New Revision: 194696 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194696 Log: 2012-12-21

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 14:29:40 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Dec 21 14:29:34 2012 New Revision: 194663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194663 Log: 2012-12-21 Paul

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 16:51:41 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't look down the PR - I thought that we were just at the stage of your opening email :-( Paul

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 22:59:27 UTC --- To the last test case of comment 0: gives an ICE (segfault) at vector_comp = field 0x62d477

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus