http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #10 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-02-10 18:34:51
UTC ---
Hi There!
Its me again. Unfortunately, I have to report that there is still something
wired. The following slightly modified code causes a memory leak:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:33:19
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013
New Revision: 195741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195741
Log:
2013-02-04 Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #7 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 19:08:10 UTC
---
Unfortunately, I do not understand a thing about all the internals and the
actual implementations. I just wanted to let you know that I am totally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 19:30:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 29221 [details]
Fix for this PR and PR 47517
I confirm for this PR. However while the original code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-20
13:34:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29221 [details]
Fix for this PR and PR 47517
I confirm for this PR. However while the original code of PR 47517 executes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
