https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-18
12:16:59 UTC ---
Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now):
It works better, but still has regressions:
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 12:56:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now):
It works better, but still has regressions:
Yes, I already noticed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 15:59:42 UTC ---
The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-17
19:46:16 UTC ---
The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly.
With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in my
tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 21:01:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly.
With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-17
21:30:32 UTC ---
Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile :(
AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and are mostly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 22:37:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile
:(
AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
12 matches
Mail list logo