[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-04-01 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-18 12:16:59 UTC --- Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now): It works better, but still has regressions: [macbook] f90/bug% gfc

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 12:56:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now): It works better, but still has regressions: Yes, I already noticed

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 15:59:42 UTC --- The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly.

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-17 19:46:16 UTC --- The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly. With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in my tests

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 21:01:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly. With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in my

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-17 21:30:32 UTC --- Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile :( AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and are mostly

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 22:37:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile :( AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and are

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] IMPLICIT CLASS(...) wrongly rejected

2013-03-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus