https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #10 from Vittorio Zecca ---
This issue seems to have been resolved in the trunk gfortran 11.0.0
gfortran gfbug109.f -fcheck=pointer -g
[vitti f95]$./a.out
At line 9 of file gfbug109.f
Fortran runtime error: Allocatable argument 'a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Unfortunately associated() does not allow unassociated array pointers as input
so your code works for allocatable arrays but not for array pointers.
Yes, a negative value for size() is good. It is a pity ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:13:14AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
>
> --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
> I believe most times a code knows if an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I believe most times a code knows if and when the size of an array
must be nonzero,
so a zerosize array would raise suspicions in those cases.
Anyway in my opinion gfortran run time should detect when an
unal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I do not think SIZE should be used to detect an undefined array
pointer, but a size of zero
warns the code that the array is mostly unusable and that perhaps
something is wrong,
while a nonzero size is tellin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
g95: complains about deallocated array passed to LBOUND
Intel ifort:
1 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
1 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
