http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #8 from Steve Chapel ---
Yes, it's a regression from earlier versions of gfortran. I have verified that
with the workaround, Nonmem 6.2.0 compiles and runs properly with optimization
using gfortran 4.8.1 and 4.8.2. Turning optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:38:57PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Looks like an unguarded union access.
> This is a regression from the time there was now front-end optimization I
> guess?
Unfortun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:15:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
The workaround should be obvious, but just encase
> Reduced testcase
>
> subroutine modelg(ncm)
> implicit none
> i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #1 from Steve Chapel ---
Created attachment 32215
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32215&action=edit
source code file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #2 from Steve Chapel ---
Created attachment 32216
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32216&action=edit
included source code file
