https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Bug 63205 depends on bug 57530, which changed state.
Bug 57530 Summary: [OOP] Wrongly rejects type_pointer => class_target (which
have identical declared type)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Reopening, something is wrong with the testcase:(In reply to Paul Thomas
from comment #11)
Fixed on trunk, aka 5.0.0
The added testcase fails with valgrind due to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Reopening, something is wrong with the testcase:(In reply to Paul Thomas from
comment #11)
Fixed on trunk, aka 5.0.0
The added testcase fails with valgrind due to memory errors,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 6 18:15:01 2015
New Revision: 220482
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220482root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-06 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34331
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34331action=edit
A yet more nearly final patch
This patch still has some memory leakage issues... I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
For the record, I have a patch in my working tree such that
gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_10.f90 is miscomputed with -m32
(I did not yet investigate the problem: too many
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 34234 [details]
A near final patch
First, the patch does not apply cleanly on trunk:
File to patch: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
patching file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33995|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33834|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The attached patch runs the testcase below without memory leaks but
causes regressions in:
class_allocate_7.f03
class_to_type_2.f90
typebound_operator_7.f03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
17 matches
Mail list logo
