[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2016-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2016-04-13 Thread dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Apr 13 15:04:57 2016 New Revision: 234946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234946=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2016-04-10 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2016-04-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am planning to submit the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi2016-01-04 19:51:09.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi 2016-04-06 17:15:01.0 +0200 @@

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2015-09-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > > Resolved as WONTFIX? > > > > Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1. > > Sorry, but my question was motivated by the

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2015-08-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Resolved as WONTFIX? Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1. Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading of these two paragraphs!-( Thus two more

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2015-08-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2015-08-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) Resolved as WONTFIX? Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---