[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #11 from İsmail Dönmez --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a > > better debug output for the failure. For now I see: > > > > FAIL:

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 İsmail Dönmez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at i10z dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a > better debug output for the failure. For now I see: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (internal compiler error) >

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Nov 25 15:04:33 2015 New Revision: 230873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230873=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-25 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68227

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #7 from kargl

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This patch ... removes the ICE and it passes regression testing. Confirmed.

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE occurs at gcc_assert (INTEGER_CST_P (size)); I don't follow the logic of gfc_do_allocate (tree bytesize, tree size, tree * pdata, stmtblock_t * pblock, tree

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Of course, above code works with : forall (i=1:n) y(i)%a => x But it works too, if above n is replaced with literal value 2 : $ cat y3.f90 program p type