[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2019-02-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2016-01-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2016-01-27 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0) for fixed-form. > > After converting the include file to free-form I get So you're saying the problem

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2016-01-26 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2016-01-26 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) > > Ideally the style of the last of these warnings should be used for the > > others as well! > > To do that, this > > gfc_warning_now

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

2016-01-26 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > There is a note about this in the load_line documentation: > >NOTE: The error machinery isn't available at this point, so we can't >easily report line