https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Bug 78672 depends on bug 81938, which changed state.
Bug 81938 Summary: valgrind error message and heap-buffer-overflow on address
sanitized libgfortran.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81938
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Bug 78672 depends on bug 78958, which changed state.
Bug 78958 Summary: Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited
polymorphic object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Bug 78672 depends on bug 68887, which changed state.
Bug 68887 Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90
-fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40273|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, obviously not:
- see depends on
- run gfortran with leak check (take care not to drown in the reports) and
address those leaks.
- then do the same for the testcases themself (the work upto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Dec 14 11:52:09 2016
New Revision: 243647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243647=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-12-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 40304
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40304=edit
Results with the new patch.
Results with patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00120.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 40273
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40273=edit
Results with Andre's patch
> But from your description I could fix (1) and (2) by looking at the code.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40266
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40266=edit
Patch fixing (1) and (2) of the list in the description.
Hi Dominique,
I have not (yet) been able to make
13 matches
Mail list logo
