https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Jan 7 17:26:58 2017
New Revision: 244196
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244196=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2017-01-07 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixing 78781 seems to need the same code path like this pr. But the causes of
the issues are not related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr78781?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson ---
Workaround (4) was supposed to be "when both allocations are moved into the
main program."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Please try again with the patch in:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00314.html
>
> applied. On my system I see no issue anymore.
Same thing here (darwin).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Workaround (4) in the original submission is mistakenly redundant.
What is "Workaround (4)"?
> It's an interestingly fragile ICE that disappears with seemingly
> minor changes to the code. For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
10 matches
Mail list logo
