[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jan 31 21:42:01 2017 New Revision: 245074 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245074=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jan 31 21:20:10 2017 New Revision: 245071 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245071=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jan 31 18:50:31 2017 New Revision: 245068 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245068=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:27:06PM +, mexas at bristol dot ac.uk wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 > > --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht --- > I think the program is

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:00:43PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > The above will clearly never be built. In fact, a causal perusal > of c99_protos.h shows that none of the fallback functions in >

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht --- I think the program is standard conforming. So strictly speaking the compiler is not standard conforming here, right? I have some tests for complex intrinsics, which I want to test on real32, real64

[Bug fortran/79305] real128 - undefined reference to cexpl

2017-01-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---