https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:42:01 2017
New Revision: 245074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245074=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:20:10 2017
New Revision: 245071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245071=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:50:31 2017
New Revision: 245068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245068=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:27:06PM +, mexas at bristol dot ac.uk wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
>
> --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
> I think the program is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:00:43PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> The above will clearly never be built. In fact, a causal perusal
> of c99_protos.h shows that none of the fallback functions in
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
I think the program is standard conforming.
So strictly speaking the compiler is not standard conforming here, right?
I have some tests for complex intrinsics, which I want
to test on real32, real64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---