[Bug fortran/80260] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with polymorphic array section actual argument

2018-11-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260

--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> Can the bug be marked as resolved?

I still get an ICE with gcc 7 and 8. Any plan to do the back port (I can do it
if it helps)?

[Bug fortran/80260] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with polymorphic array section actual argument

2018-11-14 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška  ---
Can the bug be marked as resolved?

[Bug fortran/80260] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with polymorphic array section actual argument

2018-10-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260

--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas  ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Oct 17 07:16:16 2018
New Revision: 265232

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265232=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-17  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/56386
PR fortran/58906
PR fortran/77385
PR fortran/80260
PR fortran/82077
* resolve.c (resolve_variable): Fix up expressions with array
associate names, where the parser did not detect that this is
array and there was no array part_ref in the expression.

2018-10-17  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/56386
PR fortran/58906
PR fortran/77385
* gfortran.dg/associate_44.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/80260
* gfortran.dg/select_type_45.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/82077
* gfortran.dg/select_type_46.f90 : New test.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_44.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_type_45.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_type_46.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/80260] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with polymorphic array section actual argument

2018-10-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas  ---
According to Dominique's message to the list this morning, I have fixed this
one and so I had better take it.

Paul